Up ] [ Link Farm ]
Reload ] [ Top ]
  TRAF | s ∴  
TRAF | s ∴

There is an endless flood of issues - 'paperwork' - in all the many forms it comes in, calling for attention. The 'information society' has so many rich forms of communication, that it is easy to call into the trap of thinking that handling a lot of paper, is handling it well.

We use the term: paperwork, to include the broader term of traditional paper media - letters, memoranda, circulars, magazines, and also non-traditional items which tempt instant response and reply: email, phone calls, meetings, web-browsing, instant messaging, blogging, compulsive reading of RSS feeds, more.

We teach Covey, Seven Habits (First Press, 1990), which provides a systematic approach to realigning Character and Practice into Habit. Part of the book covers the example which breaks workflow into four quadrants in two axes: Urgent and not Urgent; Important and not Important, and points out that Quadrant One (Urgent and Important; fighting off the alligators) will overwhelm the productive, thoughtful sector of character based, principled action in Q Two (Important, but not Urgent; digging the canal to drain the swamp).

Stephanie Winston, in her The Organized Executive (Norton, 1983) gets down to Methods and Tactical implementation to regain control of a runaway workload; she anticipates Covey, and re-factors the medical concept of 'triage' and applies it is a fashion suited to independent, or inter-dependent enterprise.

Note: When we teach this, there are visual aids, and acting, to help force the name of the author, and her techniques, into the student's long term memory, so that the elements may be readily recalled.

In order of preference, we seek to resolve an item thus:
  1. Trash: Toss the issue away, and think of it no more. This sounds so simple, but is hard to do. The joke email making the rounds, the ringing telephone, scanning the headlines on CNN, or following links on Google to see what is 'out there' are tempting time-wasters. Resist, and begin to own your schedule again.
  2. Refer the matter to another, optionally with a notation in your desk diary (or its electronic successor) for a 'call-back', if it is a matter for development, research, or collaborative decision. Reference may be lateral, to a subordinate, or to a organizational superior. If a matter is not ripe for decision, can another develop the choices for you? If you can properly delegate, do so. If you feel you cannot, you may need to rethink the workloads you have undertaken, or unconsciously assumed, and decide if they represent being an enabler for a dependent other.
  3. Act on it yourself. Some matters are require your personal involvement. The human temptation is to 'do it myself, so that it is done right'; other exercises of judgment or discretion are unavoidably non-delegable. Decide, communicate the decision, and refer it away.
  4. File away items which will truly be needed in your future. But understand when you do so that files need to be purged as well, and so there will come a 'day of reckoning' when files need to be purged. Knowing this, it may make more sense to note a 'pointer' or bookmark, in a hierarchical and indexed information store simply to leave a trail to the source document.

  5. Scan ∴ the item, making a dot in the upper right corner. And place it at the bottom of the 'In' basket. When it has three dots [], i it may not be scanned again, and another disposition must be chosen.

    Hint: Repeated indecision (no - let's call it 'dithering') while Scanning may indicate that a matter is insufficiently important for you to consider further at present -- Trash it

Recap

Trash it and move on.

You may need more information: Refer it (possibly to yourself) for further investigation [note that this may well mean getting it into your formal diarying and workflow processes; if it is not important enough for that, you just reached the decision to Trash it again].

Bite the bullet: Act on it.

Worst choice: File it -- but think about the back-end load of file purging. Trash it if it is not unique or collectible.

And the non-choice: Scan stops cycle of indecision.
Finally: We are aware of Getting Things Done, by David Allen (Viking Adult), but consider its rubric to be 'too late' in the process of a real world workflow to be as valuable as Winston and Covey. This said, there is much to be said for 'getting an idea out of your head, and into a durable tracking system.' Jim Prior's practice of reducing his notes from the day into:
道場 Scribbles 落書/惡文
are an example. He points out extreme case of TRAF, abused.

See also:
seven
smart
swot
Twelve Step - balance and control, when things are spinning too fast

 
Valid HTML 4.0!
  Site search:  
    
    
 
 Modified: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:45:19 -0500
Copyright © 2017 R P Herrold
http://herrold.com/traf/